Please reload

Recent Posts

Arizona Corporation Commission member urges 2050 clean energy target

May 15, 2020

Please reload

Featured Posts

Local rancher Ladd testifies in San Pedro River water rights trial

The author of this article raises a great question with their first sentence: "Does a personal perspective devoid of scientific foundation carry much weight in court?" It's a valid question. Why is the court allowing testimony that is purely anecdotal from a witness that, by his own admission, does not have a background in science. While this witness does have a long history in the area, how much weight should his testimony carry? What exactly is his expertise and how should it be accounted for. Will the court allow the Sierra Club, or the Center for Biological Diversity, to testify? If the court does, will their testimony be given equal weight?

Share on Facebook
Share on Twitter
Please reload

Follow Us
Please reload

Search By Tags