With no drought contingency plan approved, official turns to governors

I've written about this several times previously, California and Arizona have missed a couple of deadlines over the past few months related to the drought contingency plan, in spite of the Arizona Governor's celebration of legislative success. Now they have another deadline which they've already indicated they'll likely miss. It's difficult to tell what constitutes an approved plan for the head of the Bureau of Recalamation, there's an article on Arizona Public Media that offers an attempted explanation: https://www.azpm.org/p/home-articles-news/2019/3/5/147265-why-the-drought-contingency-plan-deadlines-dont-tell-the-full-story/. Regardless, if you don't realize how important an issue this is you need to educate yourself.

PHOENIX — With another deadline missed Monday, the head of the Bureau of Reclamation is now looking for the governors in the states in the Colorado River basin to tell her what they think she should do to keep water levels from dropping even lower.

But there's just two weeks for them to do that.

The move by Brenda Burman is no surprise. In fact she published a notice in the Federal Register on Feb. 1 — after she said Arizona and California had not acted by the Jan. 31 deadline for final approval of all elements of the drought contingency plan — setting up the process for gubernatorial input.

And with a shortage on Lake Mead expected to be declared next year, Burman said it ultimately will fall to her to decide how to keep the situation from getting worse if the seven affected states have not all come to an agreement in time to determine the operations of not just Mead but also Lake Powell further upstream to protect the river.

"The department is highly concerned that continued delays regarding adoption of the DCPs inappropriately increases risk for all that rely on the waters of the Colorado River," the agency said in its earlier public notice. "In the circumstances that the DCPs cannot be promptly completed in early 2019, the department must be prepared to take actions — if needed — to respond to the increasing risks facing the Colorado River basin."

In a statement Monday, spokeswoman Theresa Eisenman said her agency does not want it to come to that.

"It is our hope that the states will complete final work on the DCPs," she said. "And if they can, we anticipate terminating our requests for further input."

But the fact remains that federal law gives Burman broad authority over who gets to take what water out of the river to protect the levels of the two lakes.

A spokesman for Gov. Doug Ducey sidestepped questions of exactly what his boss intends to propose in his own comments to Burman. Instead, Patrick Ptak would say only that the state "is committed to seeing DCP through."

"At this time, we are working closely with other basin states and our congressional delegation to pass enabling legislation, allowing us to sign on to the DCP," Ptak said. "This remains our top priority."

The problem, however, is not with legislation.

State lawmakers here approved Arizona's version of the plan by the Jan. 31 deadline. That spells out that Arizona will lose about 18 percent of the 2.8 million acre-feet of water it now gets annually from the Colorado River.

But several of the side agreements among the parties have yet to be signed, with the latest tally showing that only five of the 16 pacts have been signed. And Burman has indicated she will not consider the deal done until that occurs.

The potentially bigger holdup is beyond the state's border, with the Imperial Irrigation District in California refusing to ink its approval to the plan until it gets $200 million to create wetland projects around the artificially and accidentally created Salton Sea, which is drying up.